evaluation result
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- North America > United States > Texas (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas (0.04)
- (5 more...)
- Health & Medicine (0.94)
- Education (0.68)
- Media > Music (0.68)
- Leisure & Entertainment (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.95)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Speech (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.82)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.64)
- Asia > China > Shanghai > Shanghai (0.04)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- (4 more...)
A Training and
All models were trained on single GPUs, except for SchNet when trained on OC20-2M, which required 3 GPUs. Tables 9-12 present the extended results on OC20 across the 4 separate S2EF validation sets. Table 9: Evaluation results on the OC20 S2EF in-distribution validation set. In Table 13, we present the performance and inference throughput of the baseline models on COLL. Table 13: Evaluation of the performance of the four baseline models on the COLL dataset.Inference COLL test set Throughput Samples / Energy MAE Force MAE Force cos EFwT Model GPU sec.
- Research Report > New Finding (0.93)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.93)
SupplementaryMaterialsfor" POLY-HOOT: Monte-CarloPlanning inContinuousSpaceMDPswithNon-AsymptoticAnalysis " AAlgorithmDetails
Finally,defineXε, {x X: f(x) f ε}to be the set of arms that are ε-closetooptimal. Notethatwiththedepth limitation H itispossible that the nodes on depth H might be played more than once atdifferent rounds. LetT1 bethe set of nodes abovedepth H that are descendants of nodes inIH. In the following, we analyze each of the four parts individually. To proceed further, we first need to state several definitions that are useful throughout.
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.48)
- Media > Film (0.47)